Thus, α is an interval of about 100 (1 – α) % of the same tail (AL) AL , AU – z p cN1.2 – t1 – α a1,a1.2) and t1 – α/2 () is tepertil 100 (1 – α/2) of the distribution t(n). Although the bilateral confidence interval is only an approximation, the Chakraborti and Li simulation study [24] showed that AL, the AU and AU study “Breithat” (“breithat”) is highly competitive in terms of probability and margin of coverage. Bland and Altman indicate that two measurement methods developed to measure the same parameter (or property) should have a good correlation when a group of samples is selected so that the property to be determined varies considerably. Therefore, a high correlation for two methods of measuring the same property could in itself be only a sign that a widely used sample has been chosen. A high correlation does not necessarily mean that there is a good agreement between the two methods. Carkeet A, Goh YT. Confidence and coverage for Bland-Altman limits the agreement and their approximate confidence intervals. Med Res Stat Methods. 2018;27:1559-74. for estimating the interval of – , a 1 – N (z) _p) (c2-1). Their method is based on direct calculations with the derived probability density function and the cumulative distribution function of T ST. Therefore, an assignment algorithm is required to calculate T ST`s amounts and the proposed confidence intervals of .

Note that T ST is a linear function of T-t–z-z-z cN1/2/a1/2. So if qST, 1 – α designates the 100 (1 – α) th percentile of T ST, has the same linear transformation with the 100 (1 – α)th percentile of T- or qST, 1 – α – t1 – α (v, z p N1.2) – z pN1/2./ a1/a1/a1/a1.2. As noted above, the current t1 – α value (b, -z p N1.2) can be determined with the cumulative distribution function of a non-central t distribution in large statistical packages such as SAS and R. Therefore, with the general availability of software systems and the underlying linear relationship between T ST and T, it is not necessary to calculate directly the percentile qST, 1 to α. More importantly, the T ST regimen, with the standard central process and the prescribed linear transformation of T-, leads to the same T-intervals and the other three T B, T MU and T L diets. Although T L velocity has also been studied in Chakraborti and Li [24], the resulting T L and T ST interval estimates are considered to be two different methods. However, numerical evaluations in Chakraborti and Li [24] indicated that the performance of the two interval methodsS T L and T ST were almost identical. The important links between speed rates and the resulting confidence intervals of . Essentially, the prescribed statement highlights the conceptual equivalence between the five-speed T-, T-B, T MU, T L and T ST for the construction of n confidence intervals. The sample size is six different sizes: No. 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 and 200.